Yeah, I’m concerned," said Simi Valley resident Jeni Knack. But I can’t think about it too much because I have a kid who plays in the yard, and I tell her to go outside and get some fresh air, every day. "I’m worried that there could have been microparticles of radioactive elements in the dust. You would then be tossing that potentially radioactive material into the air, said Hirsch.Īnd that's what people who live near the field lab fear might have happened during last month's demolition that sent clouds of possibly radioactive dust into the air. "There was absolutely no rationale for blowing it up. ![]() The Energy Department also told the I-Team its recent demolition using explosives was of "non-radiological facilities."īut US EPA documents reviewed by the I-Team show the agency categorized the demolished building as "Class 1," meaning it has the highest possibility of radioactive contamination. Dan Hirschįormer director of the Program on Environmental and Nuclear Policy at UC Santa Cruz State lawmakers in the early hours of Thursday morning approved SB 846, which would keep the plant open for five more years, until 2030, and give its operator, Pacific Gas & Electric, a 1. You would then be tossing that potentially radioactive material into the air. Diablo Canyon, California’s last nuclear power plant, moved a step closer this week to remaining open past its scheduled 2025 closure date. There was absolutely no rationale for blowing it up. Fukushima accident, disaster that occurred in 2011 at the Fukushima Daiichi (‘Number One’) nuclear power plant on the Pacific coast of northern Japan, which was caused by a severe earthquake and powerful series of tsunami waves and was the second worst nuclear power accident in history. In an emailed statement, the Energy Department said it "used demolition techniques that reduced dust generation… and minimized any contamination that could have become airborne."īut after viewing video of the Santa Susana demolition, former Assistant Energy Secretary Anne White told NBC4, "I did not see any dust suppression mechanisms being used, no." Department of Energy denied NBC4's request to interview someone in the agency about the Santa Susana demolition. You use a lot of water… a lot of dust suppression," White told NBC4. "You pull it apart like you would with any other type of building that you’re demolishing. ![]() ![]() White told the I-Team that the government often dismantles contaminated buildings piece by piece, using heavy equipment and spraying the area with water to control dust. Secretary of Energy under President Trump, who was in charge of contaminated sites like Santa Susana. "Not the method that I would have chosen," said Anne White, an Assistant U.S. Joel Grover reports for the NBC4 I-Team at 11 p.m. High levels of radioactive particles landed in LA area neighborhoods during the massive 2018 Woolsey fire which started at the contaminated Santa Susana Field Lab.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |